#hes a very intricate and complex character with FLAWS

[mizmatched]

The way the pjo fandom treats nico diangelo makes me want to slam my face into a wall

[agnese11212]

Why do you like husk so much.

Husk: A Symphony of Complexity and Warmth

he literally stands out, not just for his visual appeal, but for the depth he adds to the narrative. A character that exudes an enigmatic charm. With his expressive eyes and distinctive attire, he captures the hearts of many.

Husk is like a book waiting to be read - every episode reveals another chapter of his intricate story. His struggles are relatable; they mirror the trials we all face, making him a character that viewers can not only enjoy but also connect with on a profound level.

His fur, painted with hues of brown and adorned with patterns that tell tales of his journey, is reminiscent of autumn – warm and inviting yet filled with the mystery of change. The red band around his eyes isn’t just an accessory; it’s a window into his soul – passionate and fiery.

Every movement Husk makes is poetry in motion; there’s grace in his ruggedness and elegance in his strength. He’s not just viewed as a character on screen but as an entity that lives and breathes amongst us - touching our lives with his unspoken words and unexpressed emotions.

Though Husk may have a rugged exterior, beneath it lies a heart rich with layers of complexity and warmth. He’s not perfect - but it’s in those imperfections where true beauty lies. Each flaw tells a story of survival, resilience, and undying spirit.

In one episode in specific, you can see him try to bring the best out of Angel, because Charlie told him to, but it's like he also kinda went there on his own accord because he knows people are at their most emotional when broken down and his trying to bring out his real self, Anthony, and not Angel with his fake personality behind his act as a pornstar which is very interesting

after they had that intimacy, you can see Husk most of the time near Anthony in some way and he does so many things for him you won't even notice, like pour him a drink when he didn't even ask for one, smile in his direction, its amazing.

In the end, Husk is more than just a character in a show. He’s a testament to the human spirit, a symbol of resilience, and a beacon of hope. He’s a character that is perfect in his imperfections, loveable in his gruffness, and relatable in his struggles. He is, indeed, a pookie bear.

[kuwanxs]

The two faced spectre and his poor guise of duplicity

jujutsu kaisen as a manga is very carefully curated to lay some of the key themes out. For characters like Gojo, and Geto, it takes a painstaking amount of care to carefully lay out the intricate details and nuances of both their characters and their relationships and the inherent symbolism in it. Something as such would convince you that Jujutsu kaisen is very generous with its explanation of themes to its readers. However, I think this act of laying bare the key details is what really tricks the readers and convinces them into believing Sukuna is a standard, evil character. With no real motives or purpose, just simple need for violence.

Sukuna’s curation, by far, consists of the most intricately picked out details that intentionally create a barrier between him, the reader and the characters he interacts with. He belongs to an ancient era, much of what he speaks is often lost in translation to the sorcerers and curses of the current era. You may find a lot of Japanese speakers/readers break down multiple panels of Sukuna’s speech bubbles and more often than not, his speech bubbles dissect to give us a deeper, more complex dialogue which neither the reader nor the listening character will grasp at first. This barrier of language is intentional to create an air of mystery and confusion on both ends, it tricks the readers and the characters in verse into believing Sukuna as a being is shallow enough to simply fight for the hell of it.

A very essential part of Sukuna’s character is his curiosity. He is curious, at his very core. He is curious to test someone’s limits, to see how far can someone really go, how far can they be pushed? He is curious about human food (cue to him trying and disliking popcorn) His curiosity is a very significant cause that steers him into battles. He treats every opponent differently, he praises some, he belittles some, he encourages some. It’s his way of understanding and testing the true limits of his opponents. He praises Jogo, Kashimo, he asks Higuruma to heal himself, he acknowledges Gojo when the narrative itself brushes past his death. His candidness in every character interaction during a battle is what makes him raw and hard to stomach beyond the surface level.

Sukuna is both similar to, and different than gojo. In a way they're perfect anti parallels to one another. In their shared loneliness and dehumanisation, they find a common ground. Yet it is also what differentiates them. Gojo's isolation renders him impenetrable by those around him, so he becomes a pillar that ensures the security of the jujutsu society, despite acknowledging its flaws, his existence on the mounted platform makes him shoulder the burden of being a beacon that needs to guide his students in order to bring about a change. However, Sukuna's loneliness is a trait that had been engraved into his being from his time in the womb itself as a taboo child. So his isolation as the strongest only strengthens his beliefs of living as he chooses to. Which is why there is a stark contrast in the two panels between Gojo and Sukuna wherein both are titled as the honoured ones.

Sukuna is a very refined character. He recites haiku in midst of his battles, he knows poetry, he knows the language of flowers and knows archery. He praises the moon during his fight with Jogo whilst simultaneously belittling him.

Sukuna’s character often comes with an air of duplicity. It’s not greatly intended on his part but rather something that is reinforced by Gege. Its a very funny way to trick your readers into doing their homework for their characters.

He is a man rooted to his principles and beliefs, a lot of his practices reflect the traditions of his time. But him being grounded to his principles doesn’t really equate to him being moral. He lives the way he wishes to, he fights and destroys and pushes everyone to their limits, his beliefs are limited but stay unshaken.

For a character like Sukuna, who is a product of neglect, and someone who’s very existence is reduced to a title alone, his isolation from human sentiments is very understandable. He was a taboo child, someone who’s very existence stems from negativity cannot understand the concept of “love” so he rejects Yorozu. Sukuna is a character who was robbed off the very chance to be human, he lived and died as the “two faced spectre,” and the effect of this dehumanisation reflects itself in the final chapter. He dies in Yuji’s hands calling himself a “curse,” yet when confronted by Mahito he expresses his true feelings of both fear and regret.

His confrontation with Mahito was extremely fitting for his character because throughout the story, Sukuna, sticking to his beliefs, lives the way he wishes to. He partakes in all heinous acts and stoops low enough to deceive and kill when necessary. When he fights Yorozu, in megumi’s body, he tells her she can do anything she wishes to if she defeats him upon being questioned for marriage. This really grounds Sukuna’s belief of loss and defeat to be equivalent to death itself. He cares not for what Yorozu does to him if he is defeated because a defeat to him, is shameful enough to be considered death itself.

Which is why the only time he directly confronts Mahito, and through him the very narrative itself, is after his defeat. He loses so he finally let’s go of his arrogance. And we find out who Sukuna really has been all along.

[butterfrogmantis]

I'VE BEEN PROMISING THESE FUCKERS SINCE AUGUST AND I'VE FINALLY DONE IT HERE'S THE VILLAIN NYMPH I'VE HAD IN MY HEAD FOR LIKE 4-5 MONTHS NOW

Nymph kingdoms tend to be segregated via area and species – nymphs themselves are a complex and intricate species, and there’s no true way to classify them all since flying, water, flower, sand and ground nymphs all exist, as well as many other species. But for the purposes of these character’s we’re looking at the kingdom of the water nymphs situated in the cursed land aka home and surrounding forest of the smurfs, also including the forbidden forest and a little beyond.

Whilst Merfolk of the ocean also operate within seperate kingdoms including Atlantica, nymphs have their own territories and laws. Queen Kailani of the ocean nymphs was bethroathed to a forest nymph at a young age in order to settle a dispute between the territories inbetween the sea and land. Their union was a fairly happy one as far as royal engagements go, and after some years they produced their first heir - a beautiful lake nymph they named Laguna, destined to be the future queen. As far as peace between the forest and ocean kingdoms was going, everything was peaceful, and after some time the Queen was pregnant again.

The king died during her pregnancy. And whilst there was a period of mourning, the entire kingdom was eager and excited for the birth of his surviving heir, with rumours and bets on her potential beauty and whether it would match that of her sister's. So when the royal announcer proclaimed that the younger princess has been born with dominian as a swamp nymph … there was a lot of silence over the kingdom that day. Swamp nymphs are … grungy, and common and … totally not fitting the aesthetic of the beautiful ocean, lake and forest kingdoms that blossomed with bright colours and wonderful scents. Never the less, she was their princess and the nymphs had to accept that.

Years passed. Kailani attempted to include both of her daughters in regular princess duties but however much her family treated with her existence with a sort of grim reluctance, Helodia was no fool to the whispers and taunts behind her back from the servants and kingdom folk. "Who is the queen kidding, that beautiful ballgown has no place on a swamp nymph" and so forth. It was perhaps a flaw in Kailani to pretend these comments weren't being made and refused to acknowledge or address them ever, instead just trying to shove her youngest into the lime light over and over again despite her protests.

Laguna was marginally better. She at least would try and approach the issues with Helodia after the facts, but any sort of push back and Laguna would give up, even call her sister selfish and ungrateful. Perhaps if they'd tried harder Helodia's fate would not have been so sealed.

Helodia did have one friend she trusted. A young Smurfling she had met whilst hiding on her birthday from the castle seamstress after deliberately ripping her new gown. The young Smurfling Sorcerer sympathised with her issues, being already groomed in a way to become the next leader of his own village, and having the weight of expecatation to be 'perfect' as a leader felt very similar to Helodia, and she thought him on her side. When the pressures of leadership got too much for them, they'd both sneak out and meet up. Sorcerer would show off the powerful magic he was only just learning to control. Helodia would demonstrate her control over water, and the swamp specific powers she had which includes an ability to connect better with Bog Goblins - an otherwise fierce and terrifying cousin species of the sapient goblins.

Years pass some more, talk of Laguna's coronation is coming up and whether the queen will pass over the crown during her lifetime or not. During this time Helodia and Laguna fight again, with Laguna once again accusing her sister of selfishness for always staying out of the spotlight and hiding from her responsibilities as a royal and leaving 100% of the stress and hard work onto her. Helodia accuses her sister of never caring about the bullying and bigotry she faces and flees to find Sorcerer again.

To her surprise, Sorcerer sides with her sister - Sorcerer has been through rigorous training to control his unstable magic as well as being constantly trained to become the next Smurf leader. He knows the stresses, and knows how much Helodia used to shut everyone out as a kid even on the few times she admitted Laguna had tried to reach out (but gave up when Helodia put up walls) he feels Helodia is too harsh and is in the wrong here and doesn't understand the pressure of leadership because it's never been assumed she'll get any.

Helodia is PISSED. The ONE person she thought she trusted has, in her mind, sided with the enemy. She thought she and Sorcerer were alike all these years but now she thinks he's more like her sister, Sorcerer has the pressure of needing to be perfect sure, but he's loved and appreciated by his village all the same.

Helodia won't ever be loved by her people. And if she can't be loved by them, she might as well be feared.

That's the turning point.

In truth, Helodia's main conflict is with her own people. With her mother and sister, and especially every stupid citizen that ever judged her for things outside of her control like her god damn BIRTH. If Laguna is so stressed about becoming queen then why not just … take that responsibility off her, huh? Why not take the crown by force and force the people to love or fear her, as long as she has the power over them Helodia no longer cares.

Smurf Village was never Helodia's issue before. But she does hold a grudge against her once friend Sorcerer.

And when he and the others try and stand against her on the side of Laguna.

Well. Then they're just in the way.

Kailani, Laguna and Helodia are mine

Baby/Sorcerer originally belongs to The Smurfs, adapted by me

[kobitoshiningneedle]

As much as I agree with the stance that Ryunosuke is the most developed and fleshed-out protagonist, I also think that, as a character, Phoenix is more complex (even not taking into account AA4 Phoenix). Yeah, the writing in Trilogy is not as intuitive as TGAA's in general, characterization in there delivers as much, if not more

I like that unlike most other protagonists Phoenix has more nasty flaws: he's unnecessarily theatrical, VERY secretive, in most cases unjustifiably. He sometimes can be an asshole towards his friends. He punches people.

Even though a lot of his traits have Doylist explanation (for example, him not telling the details about the college romance was essential for the course of the plot), Phoenix still has an intricate personality. He's not some silly sunshine boyfailure actually, and I will eat that any time and day

[inaconstantstateofchange]

Alrighty, your tags in the 'anti-blorbo friends' post intrigued me, so... hook line and sinker. Personally, I am kind of an 'anything goes' fan, I don't mind people disliking stuff about BG3 - or liking it a bit too much, either. I like all the companions, but I do see their flaws and critique can be fun. That's what a piece of media is for, no? For us to dissect and tear apart. So! Tear it freely, mate. Give me your Gale hot takes.

Excellent, all according to keikaku (translator's note: keikaku means plan). Sorry I love that joke.

Thank you so much for the ask! O(∩_∩)O

Okay, Gale hot takes, with the caveat that, in general, I just personally find his whole everything very off-putting, so I am very neutral-edging-to-negative toward him, but can still appreciate the complexity of his character in an objective sense.

This hot take/critique kind of overlaps with issues I have with a lot of the fandom interpretations of the characters: it feels like a lot of the fandom needs to woobify the characters and/or reduce them down to the most simplified version of themself to appreciate them.

Gale is a character who will approve of good actions in general terms, but the moment there is a chance to do something new, something heretofore untried, some advancement in knowledge or power, no matter what the terms of it, you have his attention. And that's really interesting! It's fucked up as all hell, but it's interesting. And this is something I see pushed under the rug and outright denied or left unexplored in most cases, because it requires confronting that all your faves are complex and "problematic", yes even that one.

This one is tangential to Gale, but also relates to the broader lore and world. I think there's a lot fucked up about Forgotten Realms lore (obviously), but it is also so vast and intricate and Larian put so much work in aligning with it as much as possible with the narrative of BG3, allowing you to extrapolate pretty consistently based on that. I've noticed a tendency by a lot of fans to engage with the world and its lore as though they've been isekai'd into it or something, not considering what would actually affect philosophy and perspective and "human" (as it were) experience in a world that worked like Faerûn does. For example, I recently saw someone arguing that the way Halsin handles Kagha after he is rescued is "unrealistic" and the player should be able to tell him that he needs to pick a stronger option. In my opinion this completely ignores the way that druids and druid groves function very differently from a lot of other communities in Faerûn. The majority of druids tend toward True Neutral in terms of alignment, live and let live unless nature is affected in some way. Halsin is honestly a bit of a rarity for verging so far toward Neutral Good. Additionally, because of their focus on nature and natural patterns, of course they would have different perspectives on punishment and rehabilitation.

Another way this presents itself very commonly is in how people conceptualize the system of gods/theology in Faerûn. Most people do not have any real experience conceptualizing a polytheistic worldview in practice, let alone one where the existence of those gods is an undeniable material fact, rather than a belief, and it shows. They hold the gods simultaneously to the standards of humans (which they are not), and the monotheistic conglomerate Christian God (which they are also not). Once again, the system of deity and interaction with it in FR lore is so fucked up, but for complex and interesting reasons I rarely see anyone exploring.

(The above is also the reason I think a lot of people underestimate the power of the archdevils and the Hells compared to the gods, but that is another discussion.)

This comes back to Gale in my hottest of hot takes: I really wish people would stop throwing around the "Gale was groomed, Mystra is a groomer" thing. I think it hyper-simplifies the actual tragedy of his story and the one Larian was trying to tell to an absurd degree, and I don't believe it even does any favors in terms of raising awareness of important issues. Based on FR lore and timeline, Mystra has only been back in existence as a goddess for at absolute maximum thirteen years prior to the start of BG3, and at minimum five, so unless you headcanon Gale to be 30 or younger (which seems decidedly unlikely based on everything else presented in the narrative), their time together was when he was an actual adult.

Am I saying there was no power dynamic problem there? No, ofc I am not. God/Human relationships are famously tragedies and cautionary tales. There is always an inherent disconnect between the two beings. You'll notice a trend, but yes, I do think that the most interestingly fucked up parts of that story are ignored in favor of the most basic and banal.

Mystra is a greater god, having dominion over magic as an entire concept. That means the scale of her power and existence are unfathomably vast, and so alien from human existence that to bridge it would be the work of thousands of lifetimes. At the same time, there are parts of her that used to be human, grafted onto her godhood. That's incredibly fucked up in such an eldritch way, you know?

Final hot take: Gale is a wizard's wizard™, a crime punishable by death. In this essay I will-

[missamyshay]

what gravitated you towards peter & mj, what is about their relationship and characters that make you want to write them so often?

also i literally love everything that you write i didn’t think it was possible to love everything someone posts but here we are 🤭

Oooooo Anon, you have made The Ultimate Mistake of asking me The Perfect Question. I hope you have time on your hands…

Let’s start with Peter.

This might seem like a detour (I promise it isn’t), but I grew up watching Dr Who (if you’ve never seen/heard of it a quick Google search would be fun—it’s a very weird, very English show). And a lot of the same things I love about The Doctor are the same things I love about Peter Parker. There’s something so captivating about following the journey of this person who is at once both an invaluable hero and an absolute menace to society lol. A person who creates half of the problems that they solve and who is completely unhinged and often reckless but is also the one person you’d want around in a dire situation. A person who has probably seen a little too much, lived through a little too much, and still somehow has the ability to possess all the whimsy of a child and such a lust for life. A person who is so deliciously flawed. I love the undercurrent of grief that sets the foundation for what these characters choose to do with their lives, but also the abounding message that There Is Always Hope.

Although I have my issues with Far From Home as a story, it contains, in my opinion, one of the best Spider-Man moments across all the movies: in which he gets hit by a high speed train, wakes up in the middle of nowhere…and just fucking walks it off 🤣 That’s peak main character energy and such a great example of what makes him so freakin’ annoying (awesome).

And now, to the beloved MJ Watson.

MJ, in my humble opinion, is canonically Built Different. Being beside Peter Parker is simultaneously the safest place and the most dangerous place to be all at once. It’s both the most fun and most frustrating place to be. And MJ navigates that with such finesse. She’s her own person who forges her own path (many different ones) and doesn’t let Peter consume or dwarf her. She has a complex and intricate life of her own, and yet is still able to find enough space in her heart to love, unconditionally, this guy who is not just one person but two people in one. I think she’s one of the few people who understand the entirety of what it means to be Peter Parker, and that’s a really big thing.

I think there’s a reason why writers—both in the comics and in fan fiction—can’t seem to keep them apart. As evidenced by their history across the comics—the inevitable tragedy of them, the loss, the suffering, the reconciliation, the passion—they’re two characters who are destined to orbit each other forever.

As for why I write them—

It’s something I only really started doing in the last couple of years. I’m definitely not a veteran here lol. For a long time I was just a reader, mainly because I didn’t think I had the capacity to take on these characters and stories that are so well loved—especially when there are so many other people who do it so much better than I ever could. I read some of the comics growing up (but have to admit that I was more interested in the art than the plots at the time), and like many readers rediscovered my love of the characters through their few iterations on film. These films, and many of the fics I’ve read over the years, have led me back to the comics I grew up with and perhaps didn’t appreciate as well as I should have. So, in short (but actually quite long), me writing them is me showing appreciation for them. For the complexities of the characters as they were created, BUT also the possibilities of seeing them in new lights informed by my own experiences and writerly whims.

I’m sure this is a hell of a lot more than you bargained for, dear Anon, but if you made it to the end of this near-nonsensical ramble, then thank you very much for your time lol.

And thank you, so much, for reading my work, and loving my work. You have no idea how much it means to me. 🫶🏾

[redrascal1]

Okay, yet another quote from the JCF, but this one actually sums up an attitude I will never be able to understand:

LFL seeing Adam Driver’s Solo Boy as the “true” male lead 

Finn fans are constantly wanting to know why so many of us see Ben/Kylo as such.

It's because it was the Skywalker Saga.....and he was the last one.

For all DLF's eagerness to push forward with new characters and leave Lucas's legacy behind, the entire nine film saga was about the Skywalkers. It began with Shmi, mother of Anakin, and ended with Ben, her great grandson.

DLF made a fatal mistake in 'villainising' Ben Solo - and also, if they wanted us to forget him, hiring a fine, twice Oscar nominated actor to play him plus giving him a tortured, conflicting soul. As a result of this, they created an antagonist that was far more interesting than their lead character.

Compare Rey - especially in TROS - to Kylo. She is nowhere near as compelling, and their eagerness to show her as so superior ( because she's female and they are anxious to show they aren't sexist), only makes her irritating.

Finn meanwhile, who his fans argue was the 'rightful' male lead, is even less compelling,being little more than comic relief.

The big flaw with the characters of both Rey AND Finn is that they are far too good to be true.

Look at their history.

Rey was sold into slavery at four. She spent the next fifteen years scraping an existence salvaging scrap in return for third rate food rations. Someone like this would grow up with a lot of anger in her. But, instead Disney decided to make her into a 'paragon of virtue' rather than the damaged person she should have been. TFA at least showed her very understandable capacity for darkness, but sadly the following films - even TLJ, which I love - didn't develop this further. At the end of the film it would have been a powerhouse twist if Rey had accepted Ben's hand and joined the FO, believing she could have a positive influence on him. Instead, she flounced off to a Resistance she hardly knew because it was the 'right thing to do'. From there we go to TROS, where Rey is essentially allowed to do what she wants without any consequences.

She faces and conquers her 'dark side' in five minutes - unlike Luke, who took several years, and very nearly fell at the end - only being forcibly reminded that he was on the cusp of becoming exactly like his father stopped him.

She accidentally kills Chewie with Force lightning - only to find out, that 'oh, it's ok, he's on another ship'.

She almost kills Kylo by stabbing him with his own lightsabre while he's unarmed - but they decide to give her healing powers (never canon in the films, and rightly so), so she can get away with that as well.

In short, Rey never really gets to challenge her own capacity for darkness and as such, never fulfils her real potential as a complex and intricate character.

Then we get Finn.

Okay, now why should I mention the tv adaptation of Halo along with SW?

Because this series features a character who shows just what Finn should have been.

Pablo Schreiber's MasterChief (aka John) is exactly like the stormtroopers in the SWST. He was abducted as a young boy, and brainswashed, genetically engineered, and trained to do one thing - kill for the organisation that kidnapped him. Like Finn, MasterChief has an 'epiphany' (in his case, coming into contact with an alien artefact), and it compels him to turn against his conditioning and seek a new life, and a new purpose.

But the big difference is.....unlike Finn, MasterChief has killed. He has served his time as a ruthless assassin, and thus his journey isn't just to gain his freedom, but to regain his humanity.

And he has to earn this.

If Finn had been depicted as such, he would have been an amazing character. Instead, he is a 'virgin soldier' who never shed blood before Jakku. People can argue that DLF, after all, are 'for children'. But, SW has always had a 'dark' edge to it.

Han Solo shot first and I refuse to accept anything else. In ESB, Luke loses his hand - gruesome - and we see Han being tortured. In ANH we see the agonised, burned skeletons of Luke's aunt and uncle. And ROTS....the darkest film of all.....ends with Obi Wan, our hero, dismembering Anakin and leaving him to die in agony.

In DLF's Rogue 1, Cassian Andor is seen shooting an innocent man because he would spill secrets of the Resistance if allowed to live.

SW can do 'dark'....it doesn't have to be X rated, of course, but it can do it. And if they had taken this direction with Finn and Rey...what interesting characters they could have been.

Once again, the ST is so full of failed opportunities it breaks my heart.

And as a footnote....Kylo's backstory and his 'grooming' by Snoke should never have been left for supplementary material.

[pagebypagereviews]

Stepping into the shadowy folds of crime and redemption, "Last Rites" unfolds as a compelling narrative that delves deep into the psyche of a world ridden with gritty truths and moral complexities. At its heart, the novel stands not just as a mere fictional escapade, but as a poignant exploration of the human condition, clawing at the underbelly of a society grappling with its own vices. Its pages house a maze of twists and turns that serve as a litmus test for our own sensibilities and judgments, making it an essential read for anyone who dares to confront the blurred lines between right and wrong. The significance of "Last Rites" lies not in its ability to simply entertain, but to pose questions that unsettle the comfort we find in black-and-white morals. It solves the reader's yearning for narratives that resonate with authenticity and emotional depth, presenting characters who are as flawed as they are relatable. The book scrutinizes themes of justice, loyalty, and the quest for redemption, challenging its audience to consider the costs of absolution in a world where last rites may not just signify a concluding farewell, but the pivotal point of transformation. A book review of this title, thus, demands an intricate dissection of the layers that compose the human soul, wrapped in a tale as dark as it is illuminating. Plot The plot of "Last Rites" is a compelling amalgamation of suspense, mystery, and legal drama. It revolves around the thrilling journey of an attorney who finds himself embroiled in a complex murder case that could cost him more than just his career. As the story progresses, readers are taken on a rollercoaster ride of twists and turns, where every chapter brings a new revelation that keeps them guessing until the very end. The meticulous attention to detail in the plot construction allows for an immersive experience, with breadcrumbs of foreshadowing leading to unexpected outcomes. The narrative deftly manages to intertwine various subplots that enrich the central storyline, offering a multilayered reading experience. A case in point is the protagonist's own personal demons and struggles that surface as the tension in the murder case escalates, adding depth to the main plot and challenging the character's moral compass. Characters The characters in "Last Rites" are intricately crafted, each adding a layer of complexity and realism to the story. The protagonist, a seasoned lawyer, is portrayed with a blend of professional acumen and vulnerability that makes him relatable and endearing. As the layers of his personality unfold, readers become invested in his journey and the inner turmoil he faces. The supporting characters are no mere backdrops; each has a distinct voice and backstory that contribute meaningfully to the development of the narrative. There are individuals to admire, figures that embody moral ambiguity, and some who are outright detestable, all of which create a rich tapestry of human experience. Through their interactions and conflicts, the author exposes themes of loyalty, betrayal, and the shades of gray in human nature. Writing Style The writing style of "Last Rites" is characterized by its crisp, engaging prose and the author's ability to maintain a fast pace without sacrificing depth. The narrative employs a third-person perspective that offers a balanced view of the events and inner thoughts of characters, allowing readers to form a connection with them. The dialogue is sharp and often laden with legal jargon, which lends authenticity to the courtroom drama while remaining accessible to those without a legal background. Furthermore, the author has a knack for creating suspense through short, punchy sentences that build tension, and this technique effectively keeps readers on the edge of their seats. Imagery and metaphors are used sparingly but with great impact, accentuating the emotional gravity of key moments in the story. Setting The setting of "Last Rites" plays a critical role in shaping the narrative and its atmosphere.

Set against the backdrop of a bustling metropolitan city, the urban landscape with its towering skyscrapers and crowded streets mirrors the high-stakes environment of the legal world. Courtrooms, law firms, and urban dwellings are described with enough detail to make them feel lived-in and real, serving as the perfect stage for the drama to unfold. The city's socioeconomic diversity is also reflected in the locations and circumstances of the novel, from upscale neighborhoods to seedy underbelly, highlighting the disparate worlds that coexist and interact within the legal system. Unique Aspects "Last Rites" distinguishes itself through several unique aspects that elevate it within its genre. One notable feature is the intricate legal insight it offers. The author goes beyond surface-level portrayals of legal proceedings and immerses readers in the strategies, dilemmas, and meticulous details of the judicial process. Additionally, the moral complexity presented in the book challenges the traditional dichotomy of right and wrong, instead exploring the ethical gray areas that lawyers and clients navigate. Another aspect worthy of mention is the psychological depth of the characters; they are constructed with their flaws and strengths, which are revealed through their choices under pressure. Lastly, the novel's exploration of social justice issues, courtroom ethics, and the corruption intertwined in the legal system adds a layer of thought-provoking social commentary that resonates with contemporary concerns. Similar to Last Rites Book Review Certainly! Here is how you could format and style a review section of a "Last Rites Book Review" with HTML using tables and solid black borders to discuss the pros and cons. ```html table width: 100%; border-collapse: collapse; th, td border: 1px solid black; padding: 8px; text-align: left; th background-color: #f2f2f2; Pros Engaging narrative that keeps the reader hooked from start to finish. Diverse and well-developed characters that provide a wide array of perspectives. Incorporates historical accuracy within the plot adding depth to the narrative. The pacing of the story is well-balanced, offering both action-packed and reflective moments. Themes of redemption and morality are thoughtfully examined, resonating with a broad audience. Cons The complexity of the plot may be overwhelming for some readers, impacting readability. Some plot twists can be perceived as predictable, reducing the overall suspense. For readers unfamiliar with the historical period, there might be a steeper learning curve to understand the context. Occasional slow moments may detract from the narrative drive for readers preferring a fast pace. Requires a considerable investment of time and attention, which may not appeal to casual readers. ``` In the above code, two separate tables are created for the "Pros" and "Cons" to make each section stand out, with a `th` element indicating the header of each section in a shaded background for improved clarity. The `td` elements contain individual bullet points that detail the positives and negatives of the "Last Rites" book review. Solid 1px black borders encase each cell and header for emphasis and better definition. The clear tabular distinction between pros and cons allows readers to easily process the book review's analytical points. Understanding the Genre and Subject Matter When evaluating Last Rites or similar literature, it’s crucial to recognize the genre and subject matter that define the book. If you're seeking a gripping crime thriller, ensure that the book is categorized as such. The genre can dramatically affect the narrative style, pacing, and thematic elements included. Examine the description to discern the central themes of the book—are they legal dramas, forensic investigations, or the personal struggles of a detective? Having clarity about the genre and the thematic focus will guide you to books that fit your interests.

Author's Expertise and Background An author’s background can provide significant context and add depth to the narrative in Last Rites or any comparable book. Research the author to understand their connection to the story. Have they worked in criminal justice, or do they have a history in investigative journalism? An author with firsthand experience in the field can bring authenticity and detailed insights into the storyline, which can be a compelling reason to choose one book over another. Their expertise often contributes to the richness of the plot and the development of characters. Reviews and Ratings Looking at reviews and ratings from credible sources and other readers can be a useful indicator of the book's quality and reception. Browse through feedback from both critics and everyday readers to get a balanced view. Reviews may point out strengths or weaknesses you hadn’t considered, such as the complexity of the plot or the believability of the characters. While one should not rely solely on ratings, they can certainly help form an overall impression of the book’s potential value to you as a reader. Editions and Publication Quality The format and publication quality of a book like Last Rites may influence your reading experience. Whether you prefer hardcover, paperback, or digital editions, check the size of the print, the paper quality, or the functionality of the e-book. For example, if you enjoy annotating text, a paperback with wide margins might be ideal. If you prefer reading on a device, verify that the e-book is compatible with your e-reader and has user-friendly features such as adjustable font sizes and bookmarks. Series Continuity If Last Rites is part of a series, understanding its place within the sequence can be vital. Is it a standalone title, or does it rely on the narrative of previous books? Some series require reading in chronological order for the best comprehension and enjoyment. Check for information regarding the series to ensure you are not missing key plot developments or character arcs that may be continued from earlier works. Price and Availability The book’s price and availability are practical considerations. Compare prices across various retailers to find the best deal. Some books like Last Rites may also be available through libraries or second-hand bookstores, offering more economical or even free options. Verify the availability of the title in your region, as some books may not be easily obtainable or could be subject to longer delivery times. Considering these factors can help you make a cost-effective and convenient purchase. Additional Resources and Content Lastly, check for additional content that can enhance your reading experience. Some authors offer companion materials such as discussion guides, interviews, and supplemental research. These resources can deepen your understanding of the themes and subject matter explored in the book. Websites or subscription services dedicated to the author's works or the book's genre may also provide further reading suggestions and an engaged community with whom you can discuss the book. ```html FAQ - Last Rites Book Review What is the Last Rites book about? The Last Rites book is typically a piece of fiction or non-fiction that deals with the final rituals conducted for a person before death or the actual ceremony performed. The title "Last Rites" may suggest themes of mortality, reflection, and the ending of a particular phase or life itself. Since the book can be a work of any author, please ensure to check the book's synopsis for detailed information regarding its plot or subject matter. Who is the author of Last Rites? To provide you with accurate information, we need to know the specific book you are referring to as there can be several books with the title "Last Rites" by different authors. Please check the book's details for the author's name or provide additional information so we can assist you accordingly. Is Last Rites suitable for all age groups?

Whether the Last Rites book is suitable for all age groups depends on its content and themes. Many books titled "Last Rites" might explore complex, mature themes that would be more appropriate for adult readers. It is recommended to read the publisher's age recommendations and content warnings before selecting this book for younger readers.

[the-celluloid-correspondent]

Quickie Reviews

American Symphony

Musician Jon Batiste attempts to compose a symphony as his wife, writer Suleika Jaouad, undergoes cancer treatment. 

"American Symphony" harbors the potential for a remarkable documentary, but its scattered focus and contrived elements weigh it down, preventing its full potential from shining through. The film grapples with conflicting narratives—juggling between Jon Batiste's artistic fervor and the poignant moments of his wife's perspective from a hospital bed. This lack of cohesion hampers the documentary's ability to delve deeply into either storyline. While the cinematography boasts beauty, it inadvertently contributes to the sense of artificiality and staged sequences within the documentary. Although pockets of genuine emotion surface, much of the film feels manufactured, impeding the audience's connection to the authenticity of the moments depicted. Overall, "American Symphony" falls short of expectations. Despite its glimpses of raw emotion, the disjointed focus and artificiality detract from what could have been a compelling exploration of profound human experiences.

My Rating: C+ 

The Color Purple

A decades-spanning tale of love and resilience and one woman's journey to independence. 

As I've mentioned before, musical films don't quite resonate with me. "The Color Purple" unfortunately fell victim to this personal struggle of mine. While it might be a treat for musical enthusiasts, every time a musical sequence unfolded, it pulled me out of the film's narrative. None of the musical numbers seemed to stick, and they often clashed tonally with the unfolding events on screen. However, despite my disconnect with the musical aspect, I must commend the outstanding performances delivered on screen. Fantasia Barrino, Taraji P. Henson, and Danielle Brooks all delivered remarkable performances deserving of significant accolades. Their contributions elevated the film, showcasing their immense talent and dedication. "The Color Purple" left me admiring the performances while lamenting my own limitations in fully embracing movie musicals. It's a reminder that perhaps my lack of affinity for musicals might have hindered my appreciation for what others might find to be a captivating experience.

My Rating: B-

The Holdovers

An instructor at a New England prep school is forced to remain on campus during Christmas break to babysit the handful of students with nowhere to go. 

The writer's block has been very strong with The Holdovers, but I have finally gotten my words together after nearly 3 months. 

There is nothing more warming than seeing a bunch of lonely people bonding together over the holidays. This warmth is perfectly encapsulated in The Holdovers. The Holdovers is a symphony of raw emotions and intricate human connections woven into the fabric of the holiday season. Set against a backdrop of vulnerability and fractured past, this tale unfolds like a beautifully written novel. As our broken characters slowly bond during the icy winter of the New England holiday season, The Holdovers embraces the imperfections of its characters. Portraying their brokenness not as a flaw but as a mosaic of the human condition. Through their compassion and solidarity, they lift each other up with their fragile, yet healing human spirit. It's a beautiful love letter to the beauty of embracing our vulnerabilities and finding strength in the unlikeliest of connections. 

The performances in The Holdovers are nothing short of a masterclass in emotive storytelling. Each actor embodies their character's vulnerability and solidarity with such depth and authenticity that it feels as though you’re peering directly into their souls. Paul Giamatti has not been this good in years. He is a tour de force in this character performance. Giamatti brings a complexity that is both haunting and heartrending. His portrayal of vulnerability and inner turmoil with such raw authenticity is deeply resonating. With each expression and subtle shift in demeanor, Giamatti captures the essence of his character that is burdened by the weight of his path as he tries to lift up the future generation. Dominic Sessa makes his film debut in The Holdovers, yet you can not tell it in his performance. For his breakout role, he perfectly portrays the emotional rollercoaster of being a teenager stranded during the holidays. His moments of vulnerability and teenage rebellion are captivating as it is raw. I can’t wait to see what the future lies ahead for him.  Da’Vine Joy Randolph's performance is a revelation. She masterfully navigates her character through numerous layers of grief and resilience. She has a commanding and endearing on-screen presence that perfectly balances with the performances of Giamatti and Sessa. This ensemble is sure to get showered in Oscar nominations. 

The Holdovers is an emotional journey that leaves an enduring imprint on the soul. With stellar performances, poignant storytelling, and an exploration of the human spirit amidst vulnerability and resilience, this cinematic gem transcends the screen. 

My Rating: A

Saltburn

Struggling to find his place at Oxford University, student Oliver Quick finds himself drawn into the world of the charming and aristocratic Felix Catton, who invites him to Saltburn, his eccentric family's estate, for a summer never to be forgotten. 

Saltburn had many scenes that were not on my bingo card for 2023. 

In her latest daring creation, "Saltburn," Academy Award Winner Emerald Fennell plunges us into a world of opulence, extravagance, covetousness, and deceit. This audacious feature blurs the lines where rawness meets the unconventional, offering a provocative cinematic journey. Brace yourself, though, as "Saltburn" isn't your run-of-the-mill film—it's a twisted, gut-churning spectacle that might not sit well with everyone. It's a daring plunge into the abyss of the human psyche, a narrative that revels in its unsettling nature. But for those who revel in the unconventional and relish the unconventional chaos (like me), "Saltburn" might just become an adored and cherished experience.

While "Saltburn" grapples with its twisted narrative, it struggles to untangle itself from a convoluted storyline lacking coherence and strong character development. Yet, within this messy concoction, there's an undeniable sense of amusement that persists. It's a chaotic whirlwind that, despite its flaws, manages to retain a certain allure. However, what truly captivates this labyrinthine plot is the thematic depth it carries. Emerald Fennell orchestrates a tale submerged in themes of excess, envy, and unbridled ambition. Her unapologetic direction exposes the murky waters of human desires, unveiling the lengths individuals go to in pursuit of wealth and comfort. It's more than a mere "eat-the-rich" narrative; it's a profound commentary on the sacrifices one is willing to make for affluence. Fennell's artistry shines as she refines her directorial style, seamlessly weaving sound and cinematography to enhance the film's impact. Despite the narrative messiness, her adeptness at storytelling and the nuanced exploration of themes elevate the film beyond its tangled web of a plot.

Although the characters may lack some depth, the acting ensemble truly shines in this production. Barry Keoghan continues to showcase his ascent as one of Hollywood’s top emerging actors, delivering a chilling portrayal of Oliver Quick. His character’s blend of pathetic vulnerability and hidden malevolence creates a memorizing performance that captures attention.  Jacob Elordi's portrayal is intriguingly captivating, balancing charisma with a quietly elitist aura that will mesmerize the audience.  Moreover, Rosamund Pike and Richard E. Grant command attention with their uproarious portrayals of the chaotic and disconnected world of the elites, delivering moments of genuine hilarity.

"Saltburn" is a cinematic enigma, a whirlwind of chaos and audacity that leaves an indelible mark on the viewer. While the film grapples with its narrative complexities, its thematic depth and unflinching exploration of human desires linger in the mind long after the credits roll. Emerald Fennell's daring direction, though occasionally obscured by the film's turbulence, unveils a profound commentary on ambition and excess. It's a film that challenges, provokes, and intrigues, inviting audiences to wade into its murky waters. Despite its imperfections, "Saltburn" stands as a testament to the power of storytelling that both disturbs and captivates, leaving a lasting impression on those willing to navigate its captivating, albeit tempestuous, narrative journey.

My Rating: B+

The Iron Claw

The true story of the inseparable Von Erich brothers, who made history in the intensely competitive world of professional wrestling in the early 80s. 

While wrestling isn't my forte, growing up in Texas acquainted me with the Von Erich brothers. I knew of their ‘“curse” but I did not expect this family to have such a tragic history. Writer and director, Sean Durkin dives into the harrowing tale of the Von Erick brothers, unearthing the tragic narrative that transcends the realm of wrestling lore. Here Derkin peels back the layers of generational trauma, painting a poignant picture of a family haunted by the weight of their legacy. Yet amidst this despair, a glimmer of hope emerges—a poignant testament to the power of brotherly love and the resilience to break free from the shackles of that very trauma.

Durkin delicately and compassionately guides us through the turbulent history of the Von Erich brothers, unflinchingly exposing the trauma and immense pressure imposed by Fritz Von Erich on his sons, living vicariously through their accomplishments. The film doesn't shy away from portraying the relentless demands Fritz imposed on his boys, pushing them to their limits to fulfill his own unattained ambitions. Despite enduring this abuse, the resilient bond between the brothers stands as a powerful testament to solidarity and endurance in the face of paternal tyranny. However, the strength of brotherly love has its limits. The narrative unfolds tragically, depicting a series of devastating events from su*cides to heartbreaking illnesses that tears this family apart. As the patriarch is forced to confront his own actions, the remaining son courageously breaks free from the chains of his father's influence. "The Iron Claw" paints a heartrending portrait of human struggles, the repercussions of fame, and the haunting inheritance of generational trauma. Yet, amidst this turmoil, it poignantly illustrates how resilience can emerge even from the darkest and most trying circumstances.

Zac Efron delivers an astounding portrayal of Kevin Von Erich, marking a career-defining performance. His depiction of the lone surviving brother is deeply haunting, showcasing an incredible depth of emotion and sorrow communicated through silent yet profoundly impactful expressions. Jeremy Allen White, Harris Dickinson, and Stanley Simons deliver equally poignant performances, conveying immense trauma and shame with the quiet intensity of their eyes, a mesmerizing display of acting prowess. Holt McCalleny impeccably embodies the toxic patriarch, Fritz Von Erich, exuding a perfectly calibrated harmful demeanor that fits the role flawlessly. On the other hand, Lily James' performance radiates hope, serving as the epitome of resilience in the narrative.

The narrative ventures beyond the confines of wrestling, delving into the tragic tale of the Von Erich family. Poignant performances paint a vivid tapestry of suffering and strength under the weight of paternal oppression. In moments of heart-wrenching sorrow and unwavering fraternal bond, the film unravels a complex story interwoven with resilience rising from profound darkness. "The Iron Claw" deserves recognition from the Academy. Alongside its compelling storytelling, the wrestling scenes are a spectacle, flawlessly capturing the fervor of early '80s wrestling.

My Rating: A-

[goodbookblogger]

Long live the King.

Stephen King, a name synonymous with horror and suspense, has a unique ability to captivate readers in a world of uncanny tales and spine-chilling narratives. His books possess an undeniable allure, drawing readers in with their hauntingly vivid descriptions, complex characters, and intricate plots. As a devoted reader, I find myself irresistibly drawn to King's works for several compelling reasons.

First and foremost, King's unparalleled storytelling mastery keeps me entranced from the very beginning. His knack for building suspense, creating richly detailed settings, and weaving intricate storylines is truly unmatched. Each page turns effortlessly, leaving me eager to uncover what unfolds next.

Moreover, King's characters are incredibly well-crafted and relatable. Their flaws, strengths, and internal struggles make them feel genuine and human. Whether it's the heroic perseverance of characters facing supernatural horrors or the dark secrets hidden within seemingly ordinary lives, King's characters resonate on a profound level.

Additionally, King's ability to blend the supernatural with the everyday is nothing short of genius. He seamlessly integrates the extraordinary into the ordinary, making the terrifying seem plausible and deeply unsettling. This skillful interplay enhances the immersion, making the reading experience all the more enthralling.

Furthermore, King's commentary on the human condition, fears, and society's dark corners adds a thought-provoking layer to his stories. His works often delve into complex themes like fear, addiction, and the power of redemption, leaving readers reflecting long after the last page. I'm not alone in this fascination. A quick search online will review countless lists of books that people have read and overwhelmingly recommend.

In conclusion, Stephen King's books are an irresistible magnet for readers seeking a thrilling journey into the unknown. His unique style, memorable characters, and thought-provoking themes continue to captivate and leave an indelible mark on the literary world.

(list source: Book Frenzi)

[tonydaddingham]

hi there! i'm so sorry to bother you, and apologize for how obnoxious this probably sounds, but i am genuinely curious: do you actually like crowley as a character and his relationship with aziraphale? from reading a number of your posts, it seems like there isn't a single thing you find redeemable about crowley and it seems like there's isn't any merit you can find to his love for and relationship to aziraphale. i'm just wondering if i'm reading that wrong, which i totally could be. this of course isn't to say characters can't be toxic and we can't still like them, but some of these points really confuse me because it just seems like you're purposely injecting toxicity into each and every single aspect of his relationship and his character which just sometimes seems reductive and removing any nuance or complexity from him/his relationship to aziraphale. or you liken him to his abuser (aka heaven) in how he treats aziraphale. i just don't understand, especially when you analyze aziraphale in a completely different fashion, even in instances where he directly treats crowley as heaven does in how he refers to him/demons/hell.

hi anon!!!✨ oh gosh no, not bothering me at all, and it's a completely valid question!

i utterly adore crowley! please - and anyone else reading that is asking the same question - don't think i don't! i think not only is he a really fantastic character and utterly likeable, but he's so complex and intricately written... i honestly and completely love him!!!💕

but what you (general) have to understand is that i see these characters - aziraphale too - as just that. very, very complex characters with hundreds of complimentary and opposing facets, and are equally questionable as they are lovable. i find their relationship as romantic and poetic as i do (sometimes) toxic and reductive. they might be supernatural beings, but the story is also (to me) an examination on human condition, and being human is messy!!!

what i suspect - and i mean this kindly - is that you might be reading only a handful of posts/ask responses that deliberately look at crowley specifically in a critical light. and i think it possibly stands out because actually, i personally don't think a lot of people do view crowley critically. perhaps that's a bias in my part - in fact, definitely is! but unfortunately i think the fandom is relatively one-sided in this respect. talking about asks specifically, i dont really get a lot regarding aziraphale (although id love to, if that would give me an opportunity to parse out where aziraphale is equally questionable!) so im not as vocal in my critique of him. but it's not because i think crowley is the only one of the duo with flaws and that displays problematic behaviour.

furthermore, please remember that you are only seeing snapshots of individual aspects where i critique crowley; what i mean by that is that there isn't a single instance (unless i did a mighty multi-thousand word dissertation!) where i could talk about all of my observations of crowley's character. if i did, i promise you there would be a hefty amount of good things about crowley that i could discuss.

i will also say that whilst i appreciate how it must come across, i don't purposely inject anything anywhere - i don't do it out of any nastiness or vindictiveness. i consider myself a relatively experienced adult, with a good degree of objective emotional maturity, that has had quite a bit of practice in examining human behaviour (job) and analysing different patterns and characteristics (also job). if i call out toxicity, it's because i see toxicity. if i call out horrible or hurtful behaviour, it's because i see horrible or hurtful behaviour. that doesn't mean i hate any character (if anything, it endears me to them more because - gasp! - they're not perfect and actually very relatable!). it also does not mean that i expect anyone to agree with me, not at all, but i deserve - same as anyone - to offer an interpretation that whilst may not be agreeable, is objectively just as valid.

my analysis (or critique, whichever) is my own opinion, interpretation, and perspective. it is not necessarily right or wrong, and whilst i may joke about it, i don't think i have ever categorically stated or alluded to the fact that i must be right, and every other interpretation is wrong. if everyone had the same opinion and saw crowley - and aziraphale for that matter - as completely flawless, or at least we all interpreted them in the same way... well, it'd be utterly boring, right?

all i aim to do is offer an alternative perspective on these characters and their relationship, maybe something that others might not have considered. the general reaction to them and their relationship is positive, and maybe offering a different take on that, for some people, might be interesting. if they're not interested, or disagree, all they have to do is scroll on, or challenge me the way you have - respectfully and eloquently! discussion and conflicting interpretation is good; it offers different perspectives and experiences, and maybe offers some the opportunity to step back from loving a character (as they should, they're so lovable!), and instead look at them objectively, and ask questions. personally, i don't think there's anything wrong with that✨

[song-of-oots]

#sabine has had an interesting development alongside rich burlew's own development as a writer#the very start with all the sexism it was like... hnngh maybe stop with all the ''whore'' and ''bitch''#(although haley can absolutely keep ''sneak attack bitch!'')#but as you get to see more of her she becomes far more interesting and yeah her relationship with nale is...#i was gonna say ''ethical non-monogany'' but ''ethical'' is not. not really a great word to describe an Evil succubus who sacrifices people#also to the point about nale's shock - i always read it as shocked at the *timing*#like it's not ''you've had sex with (presumably) four different people?!''#it's ''how did you manage to fuck four people in like three hours?!''#i do want to see her come up before the ending although i'm not really sure in what context she would#she is working for the ifcc so it's possible that when they reappear she will too#regardless to my original point#sabine is a great example of how burlew has grown as a writer and how the characters have become far more complex over the years#i keep trying to tell people - yes there's a lot of casual sexism and homophobia at the start but it was 2003 and that was normal!#it gets better! burlew gets so much better! he even calls himself out on it in a later strip!#these tags have gotten out of hand sorry but i have Feelings about oots and this fandom is like twelve people and a cat (and a dinosaur)#someone scream about oots with me!

@andromeda3116 these tags are raising some very interesting points so I hope you don't mind me reblogging them. I've actually been meaning to respond to this for ages, but then got ludicrously busy.

The slurs Haley throws at Sabine in the early strips didn't bother me so much initially not because I agree with them (I never have), but because I don't like all female protagonists to be heavily sanitised and overly perfect, and unfortunately it is quite possible for women to also perpetuate misogyny. Also my general policy on this sort of thing is to judge the work on its overall messaging, rather than the actions of one specific character. It would have bothered me a lot more if I'd felt that the comic was trying to portray Haley's language as justified, rather than a plausible character flaw - and I think Rich has confirmed that's basically all he intended by it. Having said that, I'm extremely glad that he also made the choice to have Haley move on from that. Not only is there a dearth of female characters in the early part of the story, Haley was the only prominent heroine, and it takes a few hundred strips until we see her with a sustained positive relationship with other women. I can certainly see why many people felt that it's really less than ideal to have your principal female protagonist throwing around that kind of language, particularly in those circumstances (so-called realistic flaws be damned).

This is actually a really good example for why I love Order of the Stick so much in spite of and in some ways because of its flaws - because you get to see that development as a writer, not only in terms of the deeper characterisation, more intricate plot etc. but also in how Rich Burlew grapples with moral/social issues and puts an increasing amount of thought into what messages his work is conveying. No person or piece of work is perfect but progress is possible. It's good to have a concrete demonstration of that.

Another example is the very conscious decision to stop sexualising all his female characters (I don't mind female characters being in sexual situations, but if the vast majority are fulfilling some romantic/sexual function and the men aren't? It's incredibly tiresome). It's so refreshing for an author to just say upfront: "my bad, I'll try to do better in future" and take it seriously, without feeling the need to get defensive and come up with loads of dubious justifications.

Separate point: I think it's pretty likely Sabine will return (for the first time ever in the new art style!) as she's still involved in whatever the IFCC is up to. It'll be very interesting to see how Nale's death has affected her.

A bunch of reasons why I have a soft spot for Sabine:

1) I like her understated comradery with Vaarsuvius.

2) Her interaction with Miko was comedy gold.

3) I hugely enjoy the way she keeps getting used to subvert traditional narratives around women’s attitudes to romance/sex (the revelation in strip 394 that she’s mad that Nale was trying to kill Haley, rather than sleep with her; strip 794 “women like me swoon for a hero, but that’s only because deep down, we think we can change them.”)

4) She may be a self-confessed “incarnation of illicit sex”, but the story isn’t usually interested in condemning her for her sexual proclivities (except for those occasions where she uses vengeful murder as an aphrodisiac, which: fair). The moral condemnation implied by the narrative is generally in reference to all of the aforementioned murder and also literally working for the forces of evil.

5) I also really like Sabine and Nale’s relationship. This isn’t because I’m particularly fond of Nale (I’m really not) but I do think it gives them both a bit of depth. I also like the fact that a non-monogamous relationship is treated as pretty non-sensational and valid (even if it did initially come as quite a shock to Nale; casually announcing you’ve had sex 4 times while off on a business trip and you don’t care who he sleeps with is probably not the best way of handling such things in real life). Anyway, if anything they are closer than ever in Blood Runs in the Family (despite a little insecurity on Nale’s part regarding Sabine’s attraction to Elan and all those edgy “good boys”). The occasionally-sleeping-with-other-people thing doesn’t actually disrupt their emotional bond at all. And basically, as a polyamorous person, it is pretty refreshing to see non-monogamy depicted in a way that doesn’t try to imply it is inherently inferior, and in the context of a relationship that is actually quite healthy (even if the rest of their behavior isn’t).

6) She helped V to thwart Tarquin, which is kind of covered in point 1, but I think it deserves a separate bullet point and quite probably it’s own separate post one day simply because I love the significance of this narratively. (In fact I hope she has a hand in Tarquin’s eventual downfall, though that doesn’t seem overly likely.)

7) She’s hot. (My husband suggested I add this one, and on consideration I realised it probably is a contributory factor so I agreed).

[animastellarumcosmos]

The world of Harry Potter is a place of magic, wonder, and endless possibility. From the moment we step through the doors of Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry, we are transported to a world unlike any other, one where dragons and unicorns roam free, and spells are cast with a flick of a wand. It's a world that has captured the imaginations of millions of people around the world, inspiring us to dream bigger, to believe in the power of magic, and to never give up hope.

At the heart of the Harry Potter saga is the story of a young boy named Harry, who discovers that he is a wizard and that he is destined to become one of the greatest wizards of all time. He is “The One”. Alongside his friends Hermione Granger and Ron Weasley, Harry embarks on a journey that will take him to the very heart of the wizarding world, where he will face countless challenges and dangers, but also find love, friendship, and a sense of purpose.

One of the things that make the world of Harry Potter so special is its incredible attention to detail. From the magical creatures that inhabit the Forbidden Forest to the intricate spells that are cast by the students of Hogwarts, every aspect of this world has been meticulously crafted to create a sense of authenticity and wonder. It's a world that feels alive, a place that we can almost reach out and touch, and it's this sense of immersion that has captured the hearts and imaginations of fans around the world.

But the world of Harry Potter is more than just a place of magic and wonder. It's also a world that is grounded in reality, one that speaks to our own experiences and challenges. Throughout the series, we see characters struggling with issues such as discrimination, loss, and the fear of the unknown. We see them grappling with questions of identity, purpose, and the meaning of life itself. And it's through these struggles that we see the true power of the Harry Potter saga: its ability to speak to people of all ages and backgrounds, to inspire us to be better, to do better, and to believe in ourselves and each other.

Despite its widespread popularity, the Harry Potter saga has not been without its controversies. Some have criticized the series for promoting witchcraft and the occult, while others have taken issue with the lack of diversity in the books. J.K. Rowling, herself has faced criticism for her comments on issues such as gender identity and trans rights.

However, for many fans, the magic of the Harry Potter saga lies in its ability to transport us to a world that is entirely its own. From the soaring spires of Hogwarts to the bustling streets of Diagon Alley, the world of Harry Potter is rich and immersive, offering readers and viewers a chance to lose themselves in a world of wonder and imagination.

And it's not just the world-building that sets the Harry Potter saga apart. It's the characters that populate it. From the steadfast loyalty of Hagrid to the wisdom of Albus Dumbledore, the characters in the series are as rich and complex as the world they inhabit. Each one has their own motivations and struggles, their own triumphs, and setbacks. And it's this depth of character that makes the story so compelling.

Perhaps the most iconic character in the series is Harry himself. As the hero of the story, he is tasked with saving the wizarding world from the clutches of the evil Lord Voldemort. But Harry is more than just a hero; he is a relatable and flawed human being. He is plagued by self-doubt and haunted by the traumas of his past. He makes mistakes, and he suffers the consequences of those mistakes. But through it all, he remains determined to do what is right and to fight for the people he loves.

Alongside Harry, we have Hermione Granger and Ron Weasley, two of the most beloved characters in the series. Hermione is a brilliant and resourceful witch, whose intelligence and tenacity are a driving force behind the trio's success. Ron, meanwhile, is a loyal and steadfast friend, whose humour and bravery help to lighten the mood in even the darkest of times. Together, the three of them form a powerful trio, facing every challenge that comes their way with courage and determination.

In many ways, the Harry Potter saga is a coming-of-age story, following the characters as they grow and mature over the course of the series. We see them confront the challenges of adolescence, grappling with issues like love, friendship, and identity. We see them face their fears and overcome their flaws, ultimately emerging as stronger and more resilient people.

In the end, the Harry Potter saga is a story about the power of love and the triumph of good over evil. It's a story that has captured the hearts and imaginations of people all over the world, inspiring us to be brave, to be kind, and to fight for what is right. And it's a legacy that will continue to inspire and captivate for generations to come.

But the true magic of the Harry Potter saga lies in its ability to tackle complex themes with nuance and depth. It's a story that deals with issues like prejudice, power, and corruption, and does so in a way that is both accessible and thought-provoking. From the very beginning, we see the tension between the magical and non-magical worlds, with wizards and witches hiding their abilities from Muggles out of fear of persecution. This theme of otherness is woven throughout the entire series, with various groups of characters facing discrimination based on their blood status, their ancestry, or their beliefs.

One of the most compelling examples of this is the character of Severus Snape. From the outset, Snape is presented as a villain, a cruel and vindictive teacher who takes pleasure in tormenting Harry and his friends. But as the series progresses, we learn more about Snape's past and his complicated relationship with Harry's parents. We see him grapple with his own flaws and inner demons, and ultimately make the ultimate sacrifice in the fight against Voldemort. Snape's story is a powerful example of how even those who seem irredeemable can have hidden depths and complex motivations.

Similarly, the Harry Potter saga is also a commentary on power and corruption. From the Ministry of Magic to the Death Eaters, we see various groups vying for control, willing to go to any lengths to achieve their goals. But what sets the story apart is its recognition that power is not inherently good or evil; it's the way it's wielded that matters. We see characters like Albus Dumbledore and Harry himself struggle with the responsibility that comes with great power, and the dangers of using it for personal gain.

And then there's the theme of loss and grief, which is woven throughout the entire series. From the deaths of Harry's parents to the loss of Sirius Black, Dumbledore, and others, we see the impact that death can have on those left behind. But we also see the resilience of those who have experienced loss, the way they continue to fight for what they believe in even in the face of overwhelming sadness.

All of these themes come together in the final battle against Voldemort, a climactic showdown that brings together all of the characters we've come to know and love. It's a testament to the power of friendship and the way that even the smallest actions can have a big impact. And it's a reminder that the fight against evil is never truly over, that we must always be vigilant and willing to stand up for what is right.

In the end, the Harry Potter saga is a cultural touchstone that has left an indelible mark on the world. It's a story of magic and wonder, of friendship and bravery, and of the unending struggle between good and evil. But it's also a story that tackles complex themes with nuance and depth, that speaks to people of all ages and backgrounds, and that will continue to inspire and captivate for generations to come.

As much as the Harry Potter saga is about the fantastical world of magic, it is also a reflection of our own society. The themes of prejudice, inequality and the abuse of power are woven throughout the story, providing valuable lessons for readers of all ages. From the treatment of "mudbloods" in the wizarding world to the corrupt Ministry of Magic, the story is rife with examples of the dangers of unchecked authority and the importance of standing up against oppression.

Rowling's world-building and attention to detail are remarkable, creating a rich and immersive experience for readers. From the wizarding currency of galleons, sickles, and knuts to the intricacies of Quidditch, the magical sport played on broomsticks, every aspect of the world is meticulously crafted. This attention to detail extends to the characters themselves, each of whom is given a rich backstory and personality that makes them feel like real people.

One of the most powerful aspects of the Harry Potter saga is its emphasis on the importance of love and friendship. From Harry's close bond with his parents, even after their death, to the deep friendship between Harry, Hermione, and Ron, the story is a testament to the power of human connection. The characters' unwavering loyalty to each other and willingness to risk everything to protect those they love is a reminder of the importance of compassion and empathy in our own lives.

Despite the fantastical setting, the story is grounded in reality, and the characters are relatable in their struggles and triumphs. Harry, Hermione, and Ron all face real-world issues such as teenage angst, academic pressure, and relationship drama, making them feel like fully realized characters rather than archetypes. Their flaws and struggles make them more relatable and human, allowing readers to see themselves in these characters and connect with them on a deeper level.

The impact of the Harry Potter saga can be felt in all aspects of culture. From the countless parodies and references in TV shows and movies to the thousands of fan websites and communities, the story has become a cultural touchstone. The themes and messages of the series have also inspired numerous social movements, from the Harry Potter Alliance, which fights for social justice and equality, to Lumos, a charity founded by Rowling to help vulnerable children worldwide.

In conclusion, the Harry Potter saga is a timeless masterpiece that has captured the hearts and imaginations of people around the world. It is a story that transcends generations and speaks to the fundamental human desire for love, friendship, and justice. Through the power of imagination and storytelling, J.K. Rowling has created a world that will continue to inspire and enchant readers for generations to come.

[ash-soka]

3, 5, 9, 23, 26 for romanticism for..... orpheus?

3. What architectural or design aesthetic would best suit them?

Orph likes things that feel airy and open, but not at all in a minimalist way, because he also loves opulence. So think big windows and archways, but intricately mosaic-ed walls and ceilings, courtyards with ponds, and lots of plants around.

He also likes carpets, curtains, and pillows with complex embroidery! Lots of colours and a really vibrant feel!

5. What character from myth or fairytale best represents them?

... Is it a lame answer to say the Orpheus from Greek Myth? they certainly have a lot of differences, but my Orpheus is still a bard who would march into the underworld for the one he loves. His love is his strongest trait and fatal flaw....

In my mind, Orpheus from mythology is most defined by his love for Eurydice, this is even what causes him to lose her in the end, he loved her too much not to look back. In this campaign, nearly all of Orpheus's decisions have been motivated by his love for and devotion to Sol, and may be what causes him to lose his own life trying to save his beloved.

But if you want a more creative answer, he also has a lot in common with the protagonist of The Brave Little Tailor, a fairytale about a man who becomes king because of a series of calculated actions, including clever word play, trickery, and optical illusions. He claims to have "killed seven with one blow", those around him assume this means seven men, when he actually killed seven flies, he tricks two giants into fighting each other by throwing rocks at them from out of sight, he traps a unicorn by standing in front of a tree and stepping aside when it charges, so its horn got stuck. All things I could see Orph doing! The tailor comes from humble beginnings, but works his way up, tricks several giants and a tyrannical king, and ends up marrying a princess, and even dodges as assassination attempt once he becomes king!

9. If your OC were to imagine their idyllic life (realistically or otherwise) what would it be like?

For Orph's dreamed life he pictures himself,

Married to Sol

ruling Pythos hand in hand

their kingdom flourishing

their citizens happy & never having to want for anything

adopting some orphans, at least one of whom wants the responsibility of next ruler

no conflict with other kingdoms

robust trade

The kind of easy reign he knows is impossible in reality.

But if he could, he wouldn't want anyone in the kingdom to suffer. As for the other kingdoms, he doesn't really thinking about them khbkhgb, but practically he'd want them to flourish as well so they had no reason to attack Pythos.

Oh and he'd also want Sol's mother to be found alive and well and to return to the palace, and if he could he'd like to meet his own parents too.

23. What sort of routines, rituals or rules do they have or set for themselves?

He has extensive morning and nightly routines for hair and skincare, also as a dancer he has a daily stretching routine!

As for rules, he has a bit of a strange one! He will perform on instruments or dance for a crowd, but only his beloved gets to hear his singing voice 💙

26. If they were to lose the person closest to them, how would they mourn them and how would they handle their grief?

hmm. unhealthily. I don't know if orph would actually get to the mourning stage. he gets stuck on a mix of denial and bargaining. it would be very hard for him to accept that Sol was ever gone and not coming back, unless he were to die of old age.

Orph's setting has a tangible afterlife, he's been there himself. I think he'd stop at nothing trying to get Sol back from there, even if it cost his own life. "I will face the gods and walk backwards into Hades" vibe, really the one way he kind of lives up to his namesake kfgdkhgb

I think the only situation where he'd process Sol's death even somewhat healthily would be at the end of a long happy life together. Orph would mourn his beloved by creating an extensive (and somewhat edited) biography of their story from the journals he's kept throughout his life, which he would adapt into a dance. He'd seek out art both as a comfort and as a means to channel his own grief, and would learn on the support of other loved ones. Any poetry/ballads he wrote at this time would probably be some of the most beautiful of his career, but would be inherently depressing to read.

thank you for sending this!! have an unfinished piece depicting his hands <3

Romanticism: Original Character Ask Game

[sharonisthebettercarter]

yeah. pretty dumb and anticlimactic as far as endings would go. generally, i think this just comes from romanticized fantasies about seeing homelander 'subjugated' and 'controlled' but there in lies the flaw with the thinking.

*human beings*, just *fundamentally*, are not *MEANT* to be 'subjugated' or 'controlled', typically if they are aware of an attempt to do this, they are not happy with it and it *DEF* can't be something forced on someone without *MAJOR* consequences/resentment. homelander's been confirmed as someone who downright *hates* it, beyond a shadow of a doubt. over and over, he *rebels*, he's losing his fucking mind over it. but just any attempts to do so (especially disregarding consent cause there are some people who genuinely do like to give up control with *informed* consent, tho def outside of the sexual context too) do *not* end particularly well--just look at history. heads start to *roll*. it's a fuckin' trainwreck of repeated pattern with privileged, disconnected people thinking an entire population of tired and abused people won't... revolt. after being pushed too far.

*those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it*

butcher's actually an interesting play on this because he's *resigned* himself to it. he *is* the villain of his own story, masks out his ass 24/7, and is now lookin' for his final fix--without someone else to pull him off the strings? he's a complete *puppet* for his father and *everything* that man wants (and he equally hates that *butt* believes he has *no choice*, that *what* he was made to be is incapable of change...)

but i def don't think homie would 'resign' himself to it (he's not as self aware as butcher). it would more likely just become another thing that proves him "right" about humanity, a new reason to double down on how awful the species has been to him and how much he hates them. and OOF, yes, OUCH. absolutely?? this i think would def qualify as 'cruel and unusual' for him--not just cause it is literally 'unusual' lmao but because he'd be forced to *be* the *thing* that has tormented him literally all his life.

i think the thing people might not get is that homelander has an *incredible* amount of self *RESTRAINT* for the amount of power that he has. all of this? would be *gone* if he lost his powers--the assumption would be he has *no reason to hold back anymore*. in fact, he'd be given a valid (in his mind, but arguably--) enough reason to fully *LET GO*. he'd be *willing* to do much more and not care about it. he'd have to get creative and be much less *lazy* than he is currently--but let's just say he's *very* good at learning from those around him... the main mistake that people make with him is that they never believe him to be capable of *outgrowing* his proposed 'masters'

every single time. he is angered by this. and every single time... he *does*.

as a survivor of narcissistic abuse, consistent observer of it (especially on the normalized day to day bullshit, hard to ignore once you learn to spot it) and knowing first hand what a constant attempt to *control* other people does to them (one of two endings. suicide or rebellion with very little outside of that and certainly nothing good or particularly desired.)

had a sweet bean give me hope the other day<3<3<3

said that the writing is confirmed to be focused on two things:

making the characters feel as *human* as possible (emotional/irrational decisions and all lmfao they're disasters just like us~! XD)

heavy focus on getting mental health *RIGHT*.(i'm guessing with a possible specialist for analysis on site if not telling stigmas to just up and eat a fat dick, either way--FUCK TO THE YES!!)

and y'all, so encouraging<3 that means they're trying to *keep* not just the gritty complexities and rawness that made the characters so fun and intricate and *humanly* flawed in the comics, but that they're *not* planning to shit all over mental health like big big chunks of this fandom (and society in general, unfortunately), tend to do.

*AND* they've even already *proven* as much with the way they handled hughie's *mum*. for those that missed it, she was there to help hughie get some closure (along with a final conversation with his dad, that was gut wrenching but so needed for his arc and what i suspect may come...) and she was incredibly well made for depression and *humanizing* that disease.

she voluntarily hospitalized herself instead of sticking around her son while she was going through crisis, after she had attempted *suicide* to spare him from seeing that. and as fucking painful and difficult as that is, she absolutely did the right thing by leaving. as bad as she hurt hughie, imagine if that 6 year old baby boy had walked in on his mother's suicide--she *knew* that was a posibility and it fucking hurts...

i think the saddest part about it is that she did what she needed to, did the right thing, but it was still something that ultimately hurt the people she loved and of course it was going to. she even tried to reach out when she was getting help, but with things like depression, there's always the risk of relapse and just all this bad shit. i was ready to be as pissed as hughie, and the show did such an incredible job of humanizing this woman and making me understand her situation.

y'all, never ever *ever* blame someone for prioritizing their own mental health and *literal* life. that is a *horrifically* toxic, abusive, and ableist as fuck thing to do. mental health is hella important. people ain't just here for our entertainment and you should always take care of yourself and your life first. of course it helps that she may just be the most rational character on this whole damn show and i fucking love it--

'who the fuck are your friends??'

GOOD QUESTION--

'that man is... a piece of shit, dear'

YES~<3<3<3!!

to be honest, i have to say that some responses i've seen about her character are super discouraging and gross me the fuck out because they show on full blast the absolute privilege ignorance and ableism some people have--*and love to fucking FLAUNT*. but then ya gotta keep hopin' just like hughie lol<3

tangent aside, this still ain't a theme that's been explored through a well done or realistic lens that *doesn't* somehow pretend the powers are the source of homelander's problems or flat out assumes he could be happily placated through *involuntary* subjugation and *negated informed consent* (spoiler alert, they ain't and no he could not because that's not how *PEOPLE* work, and also literally just veiled rape kink that people refuse to tag leik--) so yeah, 'disneywashed' basically. but maybe it would be fun to see people forcibly disillusioned about that?

i can't say i'm not *not* looking forward to all the rage quitting that's to come, because it's... just a little bit funny to see the surprised pikachu faces people make LMFAO--!! altho my preferred ending is def gonna be that 'king nothing' approach that same certain sweet bean told me about~<3<3<3

Depowering Homelander is one of the dumbest and most narratively inconsistent pipe dreams in circulation of the fandom. Apart from compound V being so ingrained in Homelander's very DNA that it is literally coded into the swimmers his balls make meaning he would logically just die if he got that much of his literal DNA destroyed, it would solve nothing and teach worse as they've already established a million times over that the issue isn't nature, it's nurture. I don't get how people don't get this. They even used Kimiko as an example to show us that her powers were not the source of her troubles and losing them solved nothing for her.

The Boys also aims on making their writing as realistic as possible with zero chance of Disney delulu lala land nonsense, at least not without complete disillusionment. Which means that the possibility of Homelander being depowered wouldn't result in him becoming less volatile or dangerous, it would realistically make him so much worse. He'd evolve to being like Butcher but worse because of the added element of what he's lost and been turned into. I know this fandom has some major issues with ableism and self consciousness, but the way people just casually drop the idea of backing an already caged and highly aggressive animal into an even smaller corner like that isn't the most cruel and unusual fucked up and terrible thing you could do that is also hellbound for complete and utter apocalyptic failure in a series that would undoubtedly portray it as such so the people advocating for it would hate it anyway?

Hmm.